Jul 05 2009

We’re in the Twilight Zone, Part 1

Category: government,healthcare,left,legislation,politics,societyharmonicminer @ 8:27 am

There is a Twilight Zone episode called “Button, Button “ in which an unhappy couple is given an unusual offer. Push a button on a box and someone they don’t know will die, but they will get $200,000.

Mr. and Mrs. Lewis are unhappy. Their car is broken. They live in a cramped one-bedroom apartment. They’re often bickering. One day, their doorbell rings but there’s nobody there. A package addressed to both of them was left by the door. Inside it is a wooden box with a plastic dome on the locked lid. A note on the bottom says a “Mr. Steward” will come that night. He comes on schedule and explains the offer to Mrs. Lewis. If she unlocks the lid and pushes the button under the dome, someone they don’t know will die and she’ll receive $200,000, tax-free. She tells the details to her husband and he’s adamantly against it. He opens up the bottom of the box and finds nothing inside. Cynical, he throws the box into a dumpster but she retrieves it after he’s asleep. They continue to argue about whether to push the button. Finally, Mrs. Lewis presses it. Mr. Steward appears and gives them their $200,000. They’re incredulous and wonder what will happen to the box. Steward explains that it will be reprogrammed and the same offer will be given to another couple, “somebody you won’t know…”

The story is based on a short story by Richard Matheson, with a slightly different ending, but the gist of the story is the same, namely the willingness of people to receive benefits that don’t belong to them, when the only risk — really, certain doom — is to strangers.

It seems to me that this is a perfect model for the desire of many people who want to have nationalized health insurance of some sort.  Particularly if they are people who don’t now have health insurance, and want a national system to give it to them, they are perfect examples of the willingness to damage other people —  all strangers, of course — for selfish gain.

Imagine a rewrite to the story.  You are offered a button which, if you push it, guarantees that a stranger will not receive the health care they’ve always paid for, resulting in their likely death, but the reward for pushing it is that you have a minimal level of health coverage for life.

There seems to be a lot of people who are only too willing to push the button.

Of course, the entire class of people who stand to benefit the most from national healthcare — the Lefty political class that will claim it has done America a great service — will be the group that doesn’t have to live with the arrangement.  Does anyone think that the political class will settle for the DMV standard of medical care to which the rest of us will be doomed?

Button, button, who’s got the button


Jul 04 2009

On Palin, I’ll wait and see: so should you

Category: Uncategorizedharmonicminer @ 9:59 am

The news that Sarah Palin will resign as governor of Alaska is a huge surprise, of course, but the rush of the mainstream media to put a negative spin on it and the willingness of Republican talking heads (who support other candidates) to help the media continue the anti-Sarah barrage is laughable.

Palin’s stunning announcement raised more questions than it answered: Is she bowing out of public life? Is there a more nefarious reason for her resignation after only two-and-half years in office – yet another G.O.P. scandal in the offing? Or is the woman who tops most G.O.P. 2012 shortlists to challenge Barack Obama stepping down to get a head start on her next presidential campaign? Palin took no questions after her unscripted, rambling address, and her comments seemed to hint both ways: that she’s “passing the ball” of elected office, and that she plans on working for all Americans, not just Alaskans.

It’s especially funny that the article constantly quotes Republican “experts” and “seasoned pros” who think Palin’s decision was a poor one, and the choices of “top Republican advisers” for this article were the ones guaranteed to get a negative reaction.

If they were so smart, maybe we’d have a Republican president and/or congress right now. John McCain would not have been our candidate for president.  The national Republican party apparatus wouldn’t be acting the same old way, as if it learned nothing from recent debacles.

What’s telling, and typical: not a single person could be found by Time to say anything positive about the resignation, excepting a very tepid Schlafly comment.  And a “local Anchorage talk show host”?  His 15 seconds of fame, for sure.  And he has to have known that if he said anything positive about Palin, his quote would be edited out of the final article.    He’s a PBS kind of guy, and probably didn’t have that inclination in any case.  Another instance of shaping the story by whom you ask for quotes.

The national political/media establishment just can’t wrap its head around someone who actually feels honor bound to do the job she is elected to do, or resign if she can’t.  Plainly, it has become impossible for Palin to do that job, in her judgement.

I hope she is merely regrouping to run for national office.  But if she isn’t, it’s our loss.

In the meantime, expect the major media to add “quitter” to the drumbeat on Palin, and to mention that in every single story on her, as she pursues her plans.

Ignore it.  It’s probably wrong.


Jul 04 2009

Winning friends and influencing people… in all the right places

Category: abortion,Obama,religionharmonicminer @ 9:13 am

I’ve referred in earlier posts to the strange phenomena of Christians who voted for Obama, and continue to support him, on the theory that while Obama is not himself pro-life, his policies will lead to less abortion.   By now, it should be clear to anyone that Obama’s policies will increase abortions, yet many of his ostensibly pro-life supporters continue to support him, surely a case of refusing to see what must be painful to acknowledge.  And now, it’s difficult not to wonder if one of Obama’s chief “pro-life” supporters has been rewarded for his loyalty.

Professor Douglas Kmiec of Pepperdine has been appointed by President Obama as Ambassador to Malta

Douglas Kmiec, the conservative Pepperdine University law professor and prominent supporter of President Barack Obama, is likely headed to the Mediterranean.

The White House said today that Obama has chosen Kmiec as the new ambassador to Malta, the archipelago nation south of Italy. Though originally a supporter of Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, Kmiec has been a high-profile defender of the Obama administration and its personnel choices. He recently has come to the defense of Dawn Johnsen, nominated to head the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, even as Republicans have held up Johnsen’s nomination because of her views on abortion and national security.

I don’t know the professor, but it seems to me that if he wants to preserve his credibility as a “pro-life Obama supporter,” then he needs to turn down this appointment.   Otherwise, whatever the truth of the matter, he appears to be one more Obama supporter getting a payoff.   How can he serve in any way as a figure of conscience on the abortion issue for the Obama administration, when he works for them directly?

I hear that the going rate for state dinners in Malta is 30 pieces of silver.

 

UPDATE:  It would seem the Ambassador Kmiec didn’t quite fit the bill.  I wonder what his opinion is NOW of Obama’s governance…..


Jul 03 2009

Obama’s vision according to Thomas Sowell

Category: Obamaharmonicminer @ 8:57 am

Thomas Sowell is the author of “A Conflict of Visions,” to which reference is made in this video clip.  You could read Sowell’s book and not be easily able to tell what his political and social perspectives are, because it is a very even-handed presentation of the matter of “visions of the public good” and “visions of the nature of the human person.”  Here he is discussing the vision of Barack Obama.

What would you pay to see an extended discussion between Thomas Sowell and Barack Obama, on virtually any issue now before the republic?  It would be guaranteed to be eye-opening.


Jul 02 2009

NOKIA: the real sellout to IRANIAN MULLAH’S TERROR

Category: Iran,Islam,terrorismharmonicminer @ 9:00 am

The American Islamic Conference, an organization that promotes western style pluralism to Muslims, and is an example of what a truly moderate Muslim organization looks like, has called on us to Boycott Nokia for Iran Crackdown

Nokia recently provided the Iranian regime with a “monitoring center” that enables security forces to tap cell phones, read e-mails, scramble text-messages, and interrupt calls. Nokia’s new surveillance system has enhanced the regime’s ability to crack down on dissent during recent protests. The monitoring technology is being deployed on a massive scale, with hundreds arrested thanks to Nokia’s technology.

From Google to Nokia, we have a problem with multinational communications companies aiding repressive regimes, apparently just to do more business.  Signup for the Nokia boycott here, and send a personalized message to Nokia at the same time.

For a broader approach to “divesting terror,” i.e., ceasing financial support of companies and organizations that do business with terror-related organizations, start your reading here.


Jul 01 2009

On the value of music

Category: musicharmonicminer @ 8:47 am

A friend of mine, a classical guitarist, sent me the link to a post titled We need music to survive. It’s all worth reading, a meditation on the value of music.

One of my parents’ deepest fears, I suspect, is that society would not value me as a musician. I remember my mother’s reaction when I announced my decision to study music instead of medicine: “You’re wasting your SAT scores!” My parents love music, but at the time they were unclear about its value.

The confusion is understandable: We put music in the “arts and entertainment” section of the newspaper. But music often has little to do with entertainment. Quite the opposite.

After you read the rest of the article at the link above, you might pop over here.  You’ll note that I disagree with the author (at the link above) about some of the finer points of the relationship between “art” and music, but I’m in sympathy with his general point.  To me, the mere fact of music, that it exists at all, and is what it is, is a very deep mystery.


« Previous Page