Jul 24 2009

Your application for Divinity School

Category: Uncategorizedharmonicminer @ 8:04 pm

This made me laugh so hard that I think I may have scared the dog.

Here is an application for, uh, progressives to enter Divinity School.

h/t:  Mike Lee


Jul 24 2009

Obama calls him what?

Category: Uncategorizedharmonicminer @ 12:33 pm

Obama calls white policeman who arrested scholar

Obama calls white policeman who arrested scholar

We already know what he called him… he called him STUPID. And the time to apologize for that as an “inelegantly calibrated comment” was immediately after he made it, not a day later and an apology short, after the media turned up the heat a bit, and Obama went into damage control mode.

Of course, reflexive bashing of white police officers is practically required in the circles Obama runs in.  And they’ll all know what he REALLY meant, and they’ll accept that the apology is a sham, and that will be that.

UPDATE:  I wonder if he ever called Joe the Plumber to apologize for the comments he made about a private citizen, or for the hatchet job his campaign machinery and media lapdogs did on Joe.


Jul 24 2009

Praying through Twitter

Category: Uncategorizedharmonicminer @ 12:30 pm

Tweet Your Prayers

Welcome to Tweet Your Prayers, the website that guides you how to tweet your prayers to the Western Wall in Jerusalem, also known as The Kotel!

I simply don’t know what to say, except that if you think praying this way is more likely to get your prayer heard by God, you may BE a TWIT.


Jul 24 2009

The Once and Future Spaceman

Category: science,shuttle,space,technologyharmonicminer @ 8:41 am

The REAL beginning of the Space Age?

Forty years after man stepped on the moon, Mary Wakefield says that the technology now exists for truly astonishing space travel and a new era fusing commerce and romance

So begins a truly fascinating article on the Space Age that may be about to begin. It includes an interesting analogy:

the first step…. is to realise that Apollo 11 mission is analogous not to Columbus’s but to the Viking discovery of America. In the 10th century Leif Eriksson, son of Erik the Red, landed with 35 men on the coast of North America. But Leif’s boats were too cumbersome for trade and his people unprepared for the ruthless ‘skraelings’, so their community soon died out. So too the Apollo programme was doomed by rushed decisions and cumbersome craft. JFK and LBJ chose their mission at random and their ship with a single thought in mind: beat Russia. No thought for our space-faring future.

Yes. SOMEBODY is going to explore, and exploit, space, and the resources that are there. But that may or may not be the USA.   Europe, Russia, China, India, Japan, Brazil, even Israel, all have the capability to do what the USA may not get around to doing, if it is too complacent, too self-absorbed, too politically correct.

What we need is earth-to-orbit technology that’s more appropriate to the institutional scale of corporations, instead of governments. And that means space planes instead of rockets.

Once you’ve realised that the space age isn’t over, that it hasn’t even begun yet, the second step to understanding the point of space is to realise that like Columbus, we now have the right vehicles for proper exploration. All around the world right now light, cheap space planes (launched and landed horizontally) are rolling from the drawing-board to runway. Whereas a rocket-launched shuttle needs battalions of keepers to brush it up again ready for flight, space planes are more modest. They might even be as easy to maintain as jet planes and able to launch with a few days’ or hours’ notice, at the whim of an impetuous cosmonaut. Most of a rocket’s weight is taken up by the oxidiser, but clever space planes can suck in oxygen from the atmosphere to burn fuel at least part of the way to orbit. Space planes will offer a relatively cheap way of delivering cargo into orbit, and once that begins to happen, our universe begins to unfurl.

What’s maddening is that very much of what is now being proposed is OLD NEWS, and could have been done thirty or forty years ago. For example, solar power satellites:

There’s much vicious debate online between geeks about the efficacy of asteroid mining, but spaced-based solar panels are a given. Because there are no clouds in space (the sun always shines on ET) the panels will soak up more and more powerful rays, then they’d beam the energy back to earth. This isn’t science fiction, it’s future fact.

In April this year a company called Solaren signed a contract with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company in northern California. They plan to hoick a kilometre-wide panel into orbit in 2016 and beam back 200MW of energy.

G.  Harry Stine was writing about this in the 1970s (!) and his book, “Space Power“, is still available online.  Further, President Obama has been challenged to fund a national project building solar power satellites.  But it seems he’d rather spend trillions on reducing the average quality of healthcare in America, insead of funding a project that would earn tens or hundreds of trillions for the national economy.

So we’ll see.  Will the lingua franca of space travelers be English?  Or Chinese?  I’m not looking forward to buying electricty from Peking.


Jul 23 2009

More Inconvenient Truths About “Diversity” on College Campuses

Category: diversityamuzikman @ 9:00 am

From admissions polices, to retention studies, to course offerings, to degree programs, most, if not all colleges and universities are making a concerted effort to achieve “diversity”.  But when one strips away all the rhetoric, the posturing, the prefixes, the suffixes, the self-righteousness, and the good intentions, what’s left  is no more or less than a manipulation of numbers based on race.  How many students of this color and how many students of that color.

In Ward Connerly’s recent essay the latest racial-manipulation admissions plan of the UC regents is revealed, along with some startling information about what may lie behind the changes being made.  Read it all – it isn’t long.

Sadly I must wholeheartedly agree with Connerly.  The goal of most universities is not to be color-blind  It is to be color-coordinated…and white is definitely not in fashion.


Jul 22 2009

Woulda coulda shoulda

Category: government,healthcare,science,spaceharmonicminer @ 8:45 am

We’ve commented here before about the necessity of research and development, and the fact that some programs of R and D are so huge that only governments have the resources and long-term commitment to fund them.  And now, here is an article about where we would have been if  Apollo had not been cancelled, and NASA had been fully funded to continue lunar and planetary exploration and colonization.

What if things had been different that summer? Suppose Congress had granted NASA’s wish, then fast-forward 40-odd years…

It’s a fascinating read, admittedly conjectural, but essentially believable, about where we would be today.  And it would be better if we were.

In the meantime, Obama and nationalized healthcare are about to defund the huge bulk of medical and pharmaceutical research now under way, by the very simple mechanism of sucking the profit out of it, by adopting the European model of health care that’s killed the bulk of medical research there.

When I was 15, I was sure that by this time in my life, we’d be on Mars already.  That just seemed to be the direction things were going, and indeed we landed on the moon just three years later.  I find myself looking back with regret on the years we wasted, knowing that it’s entirely possible that I will not even live to see a Mars landing.

In forty years, will 57 yr olds of that year be saying, “When I was a kid, I thought by now we’d have personalized gene therapy that would cure cancer and most inherited diseases, replacement organs grown from stem cells, and significant life extension therapies….  but then Congress decided we should have nationalized health care, which quickly became health care rationing, and research just sort of really, really slowed down.”?

That decision may well be made in the next few weeks.  If you care about your own prospects, or those of your kids and grand-kids, I suggest you tell your congressman to OPPOSE the total takeover of healthcare by the federal government, and specifically, to OPPOSE the so-called “public option,” which is guaranteed to provide the incentive for most employers to cancel their own insurance programs, and dump their employees into the public system.

Just as it will also remove the profit motive as an incentive for the bulk of pharmaceutical and medical research.


Jul 21 2009

“Defending” Social Security, and predicting nationalized health care

Category: Congress,Democrat,government,healthcare,socialismharmonicminer @ 9:05 am

There is an email in circulation that basically gives a moderately inaccurate history of social security in the USA, and makes some statements that are technically incorrect, but still fairly portrays (with a few errors) the broad sweep of changes in the system since it begin in the 1930s under FDR.  It is an example of well-meant and over-the-top reporting that would have done better to be scrupulously accurate.  Scrupulous accuracy would have revealed the situation as bad enough without the errors in the report.

Snopes attempts to debunk the email with a lot of explanation and clarification here.  What’s sadly funny is this:  the Snopes people seem to believe that their explanation somehow makes it all better, when what they end up admitting is nearly as bad as what is alleged in the original email.  Especially risible is Snopes’ attempt to de-link the Democrat party from increases in SSA taxes, increases in SSA benefits/spending, and congressional misappropriation for other purposes than originally intended, by using smokescreens like “borrowing from the social security ‘trust fund’,” etc.  Sure, a few Republicans erred here and there.  But it was overwhelmingly Democrats who pushed the spiraling ponzi scheme.

An example:  FDR did not “promise,” as alleged in the email, that the tax to fund SSA would only be 1% forever.  What he did, in the time-honored, incrementalist tradition of leftist-liberals everywhere, is create a system where the initial tax would be relatively light, and would increase slowly, over several years, so that most people who even understood what was going on at the time thought the tax would only be 1% for the forseeable future.  (How many people in mainstream USA at the time carefully reviewed legislation in detail, with all planned future changes, before forming an opinion of it?)   It is now a total of 15%, half directly out of your check, half “paid by the employer,” but in fact part of the employer’s cost of having you as an employee, by federal law.  It is going to go up, and the income ceiling that will be taxed is going to go up.

I hope you younger folks enjoy paying for my benefits.  Serves you right for voting for Democrats, in a spasm of hopey-changey good feeling.  We’ll see how good you feel when you’re paying for my 30 year vacation after retirement.

Read the Snopes article, and see if you don’t find Snopes’ defense to be nearly as damning as the email was in the first place.

And here is another take on the issue.  And another.

Exit question:  does any person who knows anything about the history of entitlement programs believe that when a national health care system for everyone is created, it will cost as little as proponents claim at its founding?

Only people with their eyes screwed tightly shut, and earplugs snugly in place.

Tags:


Jul 20 2009

Obama, Sanger, Ginsburg and Holdren: the common thread

Category: abortion,government,healthcare,Obama,race,racismharmonicminer @ 9:49 am

Read it all.


Jul 20 2009

From Russia with love : Part 1

Category: Uncategorizedharmonicminer @ 9:11 am

Pharmaceutical Firms Need Incentives to Create Drugs and Vaccines against Emergent Threats

Pharmaceutical firms need incentives, including lucrative patents, to keep creating drugs and vaccines against emergent threats such as the H1N1 influenza pandemic, the World Health Organisation’s head said on Tuesday.

“Progress in public health depends on innovation. Some of the greatest strides forward for health have followed the development and introduction of new medicines and vaccines,” said WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said.

Chan, who last month declared a full pandemic underway from the H1N1 virus, said that patents can help ensure that companies develop medicines to “stay ahead of the development of drug resistance” in diseases like malaria and tuberculosis.

The discovery of isolated H1N1 infections that resist the anti-viral Tamiflu, made by Roche and Gilead, and the global scramble to secure flu vaccines have shown the importance of robust research and development, Chan said.

“Innovation is needed to keep pace with the emergence of new diseases, including pandemic influenza caused by the new H1N1 virus,” she told a meeting on intellectual property and health, a contentious issue that has divided rich and poor nations, Reuters reports.

Even the Russians seem to understand something Obama does not: without the incentive of profit, pharmaceutical innovation slows or stops. Along with other kinds of medical innovation, of course.


Jul 19 2009

The grand Islamic choral tradition. Not.

Category: Iran,Islam,musicharmonicminer @ 8:30 am

Iran: Artist gets five year jail term for musical Koran

An Iranian artist has been sentenced to five years in prison for having put the Koran to music. According to ‘Fardanews’, the Iranian authorities considered the move “offensive to Islamic morality”.

Mohsen Namju is accused of having ridiculed the Koran, “reciting it in a western and anti-Islamic style”.

One of the major experts on recitation of the the Koran in Iran, Abbas Salimi, reported the musician to the Islamic court in Tehran.

The court found the artist guilty for having breached “Islamic morality”.

After the sentence, Abbas Salimi was reportedly “very satisfied” and underlined the importance of “defending the sacredness of god’s book”.

“No-one should be able to ridicule it,” he said.

Under Islamic law, music is allowed if it does not result in provoking the faithful.

Combining the recitation of the Koran and popular songs, like the Iranian artist, is not tolerated under Islamic Sharia law.

And you thought your local church was musically conservative. Along these lines: is there any equivalent to jazz in Islam?

Just kidding.


« Previous PageNext Page »