Cheney’s speech contained omissions, misstatements
And Obama’s didn’t? This is just the very model of selective reporting.
In any case, when was the last time you saw ANY report in the major media that simply went down a list of Obama’s statements in a speech, and then quoted someone else contradicting each one with contrary information and perspectives, without then giving Obama’s side a chance to rebut THOSE positions? What, you say you can’t remember that EVER happening?
I can’t either.
The media could start with fair reporting on what he’s doing to the economy, and plans to do to health care.
But that would be in some alternate universe where the major media wasn’t made up of Obama groupies.
In any case, note that most of the “contradictory evidence” reported by the article comes from people now in Obama’s pay or sphere of influence.
